The Endorsement

Murray Rankin is an outstanding candidate, articulate, accomplished, and passionate.

But he has damaged his credibility by insisting that the secondary sewage treatment plant plan can’t be stopped and more worryingly supports a plant that has been shown to have no net environmental benefit.

It can, and it doesn’t.

Yesterday, his ally in the lunacy of the billion dollar boondoggle, and the best possible example of image and pandering over science and fiscal responsibility, Mr. Floatie, chose to endorse Murray Rankin.

Sometimes in life you get the partners you deserve.

METRO NEWS -- Mr. Floatie endorses NDP’s Rankin in Victoria byelection

A transcript of Mr. Rankin's comments on a CBC radio interview from October 16, 2012 follows:

RANKIN: The problem with the sewage debate is that the provincial Liberals under a fellow named Barry Penner ordered the CRD to do secondary treatment in 2006. Recently the federal regulations were changed in the same, in the same vein. The CRD has to do what the law requires. And in 2006 the Liberal government ordered that to be done. Denise Savoie went to Ottawa and unlike in other communities, which needed sewage as well to comply with the law, managed to get some 250 million dollars to get on with it.


And the studies that I’ve seen within the CRD suggest that there is an environmental problem.


Add your opinion Rate this story Share Subscribe E-mail Print

Post new comment

Keep up with CEF!

User login

Login using social networks

Twin Virtues: Inequality of Outcomes & Equality of Opportunity©

Twin Virtues

Ultimately, the most successful societies find the balance between the twin virtues of inequality of outcomes and equality of opportunity.

The new politics must marry the twin virtues of unequal outcomes and equality of opportunity.

When too few get too much everybody loses.

Feminism is about women living their lives on their own terms, marshalling the resources of the society to make that possible, and men embracing this as vital to a successful society and their own liberation.

Can it be that striving for equality of opportunity however imperfect the process not only benefits the individual but also creates benefits for the society that are unintended but wonderful?

Economics must be a 'moral enterprise' as much as politics claims to be. Economic outcomes need to be framed in terms of right and wrong not just efficiency if only because these often align in surprising ways that are good for society and the economy.

My vision of Canada is that any Canadian child from a family of limited circumstance can expect to have a chance at lifetime of unlimited opportunities.

Free trade is a wonderful thing. Time and time again economists have proven that free trade creates enormous wealth for each country 'on the whole'. Historians have shown that free trade is usually associated with rising political, social and cultural liberty. The perennial problem is that free trade always creates tremendous disruption for thousands even millions of individuals often concentrated in one geography, and where the state is idle, not investing in best in class instruments of social justice, free trade can be a permanent ticket out of the middle class, down, not up.

Tax policy should be founded on the principle of generating steady tax revenues sufficient to maximise environmentally sustainable economic growth in order to fund fair government.

Public policy should be designed to decrease inequality before the law and increase equality of opportunity.

Capitalism is not the problem; the problem is what we do with capitalism.

Content is always more difficult to argue than conspiracy.

Let the state regulate and the market operate (most things).

Welfare strategies are best designed as a hand up, not as a hand out.

Political debate should not be fact free fighting.

Explanation lasts longer than eloquence.

Always favour empowerment over dependency.

The most enduring public figures are embraced for the causes they fought for and not the concept of themselves they hoped others would remember them by.

Find your voice and don't be the echo of somebody else.

It is possible to operate on two different levels: the practical, cautious and conservative; and the realm of ideas, open, free, and radical.