May’s Mad Math
Elizabeth May’s strange math and dangerous anti-resource policy was on display in Victoria.
Elizabeth and Don Galloway keep making the same argument that “doubling” the number of Green members of Parliament will be a key step in restoring democracy so shredded under the Harper government, and “will bring a smile to a lot of people across Canada”.
As far as restoring any civility to the House of Commons my only guess is that there will be one less NDP member to shout down the Green Party when they try to speak out of turn.
Somehow I doubt that the Harper gang will suddenly become more polite and democratic with the arrival of any new MP from whatever party.
And as far as the smiles across Canada are concerned, since the Green Party received less than 5% of the popular vote in the last election one presumes that the other 95% that voted for other parties will not be smiling but scowling.
Typically, May’s math is mad.
More troubling is the position that the Green Party takes on resource extraction and the resource industry in general.
The Liberal Party of Canada supports environmentally responsible resource extraction because it is a vital sector the Canadian economy particularly in BC.
The Green Candidate has already embarrassed himself in a recent debate by calling for the immediate suspension of all coal exports to China by shutting down the coal industry.
This would shut down a $6 billion a year business, put 4,000 people out of work, and would throw hundreds of families into poverty.
And yesterday’s pipeline media show is a case in point.
Simply saying that all pipeline construction and tanker traffic is wrong without respecting due process is an easy position to take when you are never going to form government.
The challenge is create the highest environmental standards to protect our waters and coastlines while ensuring that the cost to companies that break our laws is punitive and not just a digit on the bottom line.
And of course the real opportunity is to steer the economy to a cleaner and more responsible future by adopting a carbon tax.
Times Colonist -- Leaders flock to Victoria as by-election race heats up
Federal political party leaders are popping up on doorsteps across Victoria as the race to replace retiring Victoria NDP MP Denise Savoie heats up.
|Add your opinion||Rate this story||Share||Subscribe|
Login using social networks
Twin Virtues: Inequality of Outcomes & Equality of Opportunity©
Ultimately, the most successful societies find the balance between the twin virtues of inequality of outcomes and equality of opportunity.
The new politics must marry the twin virtues of unequal outcomes and equality of opportunity.
When too few get too much everybody loses.
Feminism is about women living their lives on their own terms, marshalling the resources of the society to make that possible, and men embracing this as vital to a successful society and their own liberation.
Can it be that striving for equality of opportunity however imperfect the process not only benefits the individual but also creates benefits for the society that are unintended but wonderful?
Economics must be a 'moral enterprise' as much as politics claims to be. Economic outcomes need to be framed in terms of right and wrong not just efficiency if only because these often align in surprising ways that are good for society and the economy.
My vision of Canada is that any Canadian child from a family of limited circumstance can expect to have a chance at lifetime of unlimited opportunities.
Free trade is a wonderful thing. Time and time again economists have proven that free trade creates enormous wealth for each country 'on the whole'. Historians have shown that free trade is usually associated with rising political, social and cultural liberty. The perennial problem is that free trade always creates tremendous disruption for thousands even millions of individuals often concentrated in one geography, and where the state is idle, not investing in best in class instruments of social justice, free trade can be a permanent ticket out of the middle class, down, not up.
Tax policy should be founded on the principle of generating steady tax revenues sufficient to maximise environmentally sustainable economic growth in order to fund fair government.
Public policy should be designed to decrease inequality before the law and increase equality of opportunity.
Capitalism is not the problem; the problem is what we do with capitalism.
Content is always more difficult to argue than conspiracy.
Let the state regulate and the market operate (most things).
Welfare strategies are best designed as a hand up, not as a hand out.
Political debate should not be fact free fighting.
Explanation lasts longer than eloquence.
Always favour empowerment over dependency.
The most enduring public figures are embraced for the causes they fought for and not the concept of themselves they hoped others would remember them by.
Find your voice and don't be the echo of somebody else.
It is possible to operate on two different levels: the practical, cautious and conservative; and the realm of ideas, open, free, and radical.