The Green Party Sewage Shell Game
Let’s be clear.
Elizabeth May supports the secondary sewage treatment with existing technologies.
The reason is simple.
Many green advocacy groups like the BC Sierra Club, Georgia Straight Alliance, and Water People support the plan.
Consequently, the Green Party’s stance on stopping the secondary sewage treatment plant is muted, mixed and muddy.
Over the course of the past few weeks Don Galloway has argued that the democratic deficit was the number one issue facing Canadians.
Then Don’s attention turned to the Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement.
At the James Bay all candidates’ debates he claimed that the Agreement was ‘the biggest issue facing Canada!’
This, your servant immediately reminded the audience, was over the top, and while an important issue, paled in comparison to global warming.
We are now waiting for what next flavour-of-the-day crisis will captivate the attention of the Green Party, but I promise you it won’t be stopping the secondary sewage treatment plant because too many of Elizabeth May’s constituency support it.
Don may say he’s against it but he didn’t show up on Wednesday morning to support the ARESST demonstration in front of the CRD, the sewage issue appears at the bottom of the list of his priorities, and at none of the events I have attended with him does he even mention it unless asked directly.
Only one candidate, in the words of the Victoria Times Colonist, has got it right from the start and is running against the mad plan.
“Liberal party candidate Paul Summerville breathed new life into the anti-secondary sewage treatment forces when he launched his campaign with a no-holds barred rejection of the proposal, calling it a “billion-dollar boondoggle.”
Summerville maintains the Capital Regional District could get an exemption from current federal wastewater regulations simply by having the region designated as a lower wastewater risk.”
Don’t be fooled by the Green Party sewage shell game.
Vote for Paul Summerville on November 26th to stop the sewage plant and the huge taxes increases to follow.
|Add your opinion||Rate this story||Share||Subscribe|
Login using social networks
Twin Virtues: Inequality of Outcomes & Equality of Opportunity©
Ultimately, the most successful societies find the balance between the twin virtues of inequality of outcomes and equality of opportunity.
The new politics must marry the twin virtues of unequal outcomes and equality of opportunity.
When too few get too much everybody loses.
Feminism is about women living their lives on their own terms, marshalling the resources of the society to make that possible, and men embracing this as vital to a successful society and their own liberation.
Can it be that striving for equality of opportunity however imperfect the process not only benefits the individual but also creates benefits for the society that are unintended but wonderful?
Economics must be a 'moral enterprise' as much as politics claims to be. Economic outcomes need to be framed in terms of right and wrong not just efficiency if only because these often align in surprising ways that are good for society and the economy.
My vision of Canada is that any Canadian child from a family of limited circumstance can expect to have a chance at lifetime of unlimited opportunities.
Free trade is a wonderful thing. Time and time again economists have proven that free trade creates enormous wealth for each country 'on the whole'. Historians have shown that free trade is usually associated with rising political, social and cultural liberty. The perennial problem is that free trade always creates tremendous disruption for thousands even millions of individuals often concentrated in one geography, and where the state is idle, not investing in best in class instruments of social justice, free trade can be a permanent ticket out of the middle class, down, not up.
Tax policy should be founded on the principle of generating steady tax revenues sufficient to maximise environmentally sustainable economic growth in order to fund fair government.
Public policy should be designed to decrease inequality before the law and increase equality of opportunity.
Capitalism is not the problem; the problem is what we do with capitalism.
Content is always more difficult to argue than conspiracy.
Let the state regulate and the market operate (most things).
Welfare strategies are best designed as a hand up, not as a hand out.
Political debate should not be fact free fighting.
Explanation lasts longer than eloquence.
Always favour empowerment over dependency.
The most enduring public figures are embraced for the causes they fought for and not the concept of themselves they hoped others would remember them by.
Find your voice and don't be the echo of somebody else.
It is possible to operate on two different levels: the practical, cautious and conservative; and the realm of ideas, open, free, and radical.