The Gann Moment -- Stephen Harper Promises to Listen to Back Benchers

CEF News-- Ottawa – In a remarkable change in management style Prime Minister Stephen Harper, at an unusually long press conference today where he took a number of unscripted questions from the assembled media, apologized for micro-managing his caucus since he became Prime Minister in January 2006.

The Prime Minister said that he changed his mind because he was so impressed by the campaign of Dale Gann in Victoria who on hearing that over 80% of Victorians polled were against the secondary sewage treatment plant had completely reversed his position from supporting the plan to opposing it because “this is what Victorians want.”

The Prime Minister added that he was not only impressed by Gann’s strategic sewage shift but also would welcome listening to Gann’s evolving position on legalization of cannabis and the Enbridge Pipeline since it seems “so many Victorians support the former and oppose the latter.”

“Gosh”, the Prime Minister said, “that really is what MPs are for, to communicate the wishes of their constituents and oppose the Government”.

Some in the audience thought that they actually saw the glint of a tear in the Prime Minister’s eye recalling no doubt the days when he was a Reform Member trumpeting the independence of individual MPs voting their conscience and views of their constituents.

Harper hinted that it was refreshing that someone with no experience in Ottawa and operating in a caucus where he was leader actually thought that they could have an independent point of view even if it was opportunistic and driven by circumstance and not conviction.

Harper chuckled at one point saying that it reminded him of cutting the GST which was really bad economics but great politics.

High quality global journalism requires money. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Copyright Policy for more detail. Email paul@lpcbc.com to buy additional rights. The Gann Moment
 

Add your opinion Rate this story Share Subscribe E-mail Print

Post new comment

Keep up with CEF!

User login

Login using social networks

Twin Virtues: Inequality of Outcomes & Equality of Opportunity©

Twin Virtues

Ultimately, the most successful societies find the balance between the twin virtues of inequality of outcomes and equality of opportunity.

The new politics must marry the twin virtues of unequal outcomes and equality of opportunity.

When too few get too much everybody loses.

Feminism is about women living their lives on their own terms, marshalling the resources of the society to make that possible, and men embracing this as vital to a successful society and their own liberation.

Can it be that striving for equality of opportunity however imperfect the process not only benefits the individual but also creates benefits for the society that are unintended but wonderful?

Economics must be a 'moral enterprise' as much as politics claims to be. Economic outcomes need to be framed in terms of right and wrong not just efficiency if only because these often align in surprising ways that are good for society and the economy.

My vision of Canada is that any Canadian child from a family of limited circumstance can expect to have a chance at lifetime of unlimited opportunities.

Free trade is a wonderful thing. Time and time again economists have proven that free trade creates enormous wealth for each country 'on the whole'. Historians have shown that free trade is usually associated with rising political, social and cultural liberty. The perennial problem is that free trade always creates tremendous disruption for thousands even millions of individuals often concentrated in one geography, and where the state is idle, not investing in best in class instruments of social justice, free trade can be a permanent ticket out of the middle class, down, not up.

Tax policy should be founded on the principle of generating steady tax revenues sufficient to maximise environmentally sustainable economic growth in order to fund fair government.

Public policy should be designed to decrease inequality before the law and increase equality of opportunity.

Capitalism is not the problem; the problem is what we do with capitalism.

Content is always more difficult to argue than conspiracy.

Let the state regulate and the market operate (most things).

Welfare strategies are best designed as a hand up, not as a hand out.

Political debate should not be fact free fighting.

Explanation lasts longer than eloquence.

Always favour empowerment over dependency.

The most enduring public figures are embraced for the causes they fought for and not the concept of themselves they hoped others would remember them by.

Find your voice and don't be the echo of somebody else.

It is possible to operate on two different levels: the practical, cautious and conservative; and the realm of ideas, open, free, and radical.