Smart Links 22 February 2012

Commentary on the internet and looking for love, why countries save or spend, Ron Paul’s libertarianism, the contraception debate, China worries, starting at Tesco, and Rick Mercer’s Rant on Vic.

Googling for love.

Economist -- The modern matchmakers
Internet dating sites claim to have brought science to the age-old question of how to pair off successfully. But have they?

Institutional building blocks not cultural habits is the key to saving or not saving. (ed’s note – it becomes cultural).

CNN -- Why America spends while the world saves
The following is an edited transcript of my interview with Sheldon Garon, a professor of history and East Asian studies at Princeton University and author of the new book, Beyond Our Means: Why America Spends While the World Saves.

The strange candidacy of Ron Paul.

New Yorker -- Party Crasher
On December 16, 2007, on the two-hundred-and-thirty-fourth anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, Ron Paul, congressman and Presidential candidate, presided over a nationwide fund-raiser.

The contraception and abortion debate breaks out.

New York Times  -- The ‘Safe, Legal, Rare’ Illusion
AMID the sound and fury of the latest culture-war battles — first over breast cancer dollars and Planned Parenthood, and then over the White House’s attempt to require that religious employers cover contraception and potential abortifacients — it’s easy to forget that there is at least some common ground in American politics on sex, pregnancy, marriage and abortion.

Related.

Slate -- The Pro-life Case for Planned Parenthood
We have a late-breaking frontrunner for dumbest policy idea of 2008: defunding Planned Parenthood in the name of fighting abortion.

The problem(s) with China.

Forbes -- Rearranging The Deck Chairs On The SS Chinese Economy
“Starting from this year, we have lowered the target of economic growth,” Vice President Xi Jinping told the Irish Times in an interview published Saturday.

Related.

The Knowledge Effect -- Foxconn Technology – Graphic of the Day
Apple’s top manufacturer in China, Foxconn Technology, is having no problems luring new workers to churn out an array of Apple gadgets, despite the firm’s reputation as a tough employer amidst a thorough probe into its labor practices. Today’s graphic shows the the different Foxconn locations throughout China. It also shows the change in number of employees & revenue since 2006.

Getting a foot into the job market. (ed’s note – my first job was in the parking lot at the Metro Zoo).

Independent -- If you want a job, 'slave labour' at Tesco isn't a bad place to start
They seem to think that working in a shop is something that should make you feel demeaned.

Quote worth noting.

“They seem to agree with a young woman called Cait Reilly, who seemed to think that to work for three weeks in a shop, while the taxpayer paid her benefits, was a breach of her "human rights".”

Rick lets loose.

The Rick Mercer Report – Rick’s Rant
Online Privacy

get Smart Picks in your Inbox!
Add your opinion Rate this story Share Subscribe E-mail Print

Post new comment

Keep up with CEF!

User login

Login using social networks

Twin Virtues: Inequality of Outcomes & Equality of Opportunity©

LimeSpot: Own the Experience.

Leveraging Social Networks for Profit.
 
Marrying the product portfolio of brand name firms with the personal profile information on Facebook.
 
The LimeSpot enabled revolutionary new sales channel.
 
Ultimately, the most successful societies find the balance between the twin virtues of inequality of outcomes and equality of opportunity.
 
The new politics must marry the twin virtues of unequal outcomes and equality of opportunity.
 
When too few get too much everybody ends up with less.
 
Can it be that striving for equality of opportunity however imperfect the process not only benefits the individual but also creates benefits for the society as a whole that are unintended but wonderful?
 
Economics must be a 'moral enterprise' as much as politics claims to be. Economic outcomes need to be framed in terms of right and wrong not just efficiency if only because these often align in surprising ways.
 
My vision of Canada is that any Canadian child from a family of limited circumstance can expect to have a chance at lifetime of unlimited opportunities.
 
Tax policy should be founded on the principle of generating steady tax revenues sufficient to maximise environmentally sustainable economic growth in order to fund fair government.
 
Public policy should be designed to decrease inequality before the law and increase equality of opportunity.
 
Capitalism is not the problem; the problem is what we do with capitalism.
 
Content is always more difficult to argue than conspiracy.
 
Let the state regulate and the market operate (most things).
 
Welfare strategies are best designed as a hand up not as a hand out.
 
Political debate should not be fact free fighting.
 
Explanation lasts longer than eloquence.
 
Always favour empowerment over dependency.
 
The most enduring public figures are embraced for the causes they fought for and not the concept of themselves they hoped others would remember them by.
 
Find your voice and don't be the echo of somebody else.