Smart Links 08 November 2011

Commentary on a dangerous future, Michael Pettis on what China’s gotta do, American corporate welfare bums, the Big Lie about the cause of the financial market meltdown, the danger of lynching a tyrant, and Canada's Liberal Party leadership gamble.

Gwynne Dyer’s warning about our hot, starving and dangerous future: climate change is happening quicker, threatens food supply, there is a point of no return, and the dubious parachute. Thanks to Tony of Victoria.

BC Hydro -- Hot, hungry and hostile: Dyer's dire prediction for our global future
"It's going to get depressing at the middle of this talk, and it will end up a little more cheerful. Be patient and don't cry."

 

Webcast (ed’s note – starts around 18.00)

The Economist on the data.

Economist -- The heat is on
A new analysis of the temperature record leaves little room for the doubters. The world is warming.

 

China’s going to make it, maybe.

Financial Times -- Don’t panic, China’s economy is not on the rocks yet
Two years ago it was hard to find anyone who believed that annual GDP growth in China would ever fall
below 8 per cent.

Related. Thanks to David of Victoria.

Financial Post -- China credit squeeze spurs suicides, violence
Hours after a creditor and his gang of tattooed thugs hustled Zhong Maojin into a coffee shop in Wenzhou, he says he wouldn’t yield to their demands.

Corporate tax expenditures in the United States are estimated to be about $200 billion.

Wall Street Journal -- The Corporate Welfare State
A cause to unite the tea party and the Occupy Wall Street crowd.

Pinocchio.

Washington Post -- What caused the financial crisis? The Big Lie goes viral.
I have a fairly simple approach to investing: Start with data and objective evidence to determine the dominant elements driving the market action right now.

Ian Buruma reminds us that lynching people – whoever the victim – is wrong.

Project Syndicate – The Lynching of Libya
Many would say that Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi got what he deserved. Live by the sword, die by the sword.

From anointment to rough and rumble.

Globe and Mail -- Liberals roll dice on U.S.-style primary to choose next leader
By proposing a series of primary contests to choose their next leader, the federal Liberals are gambling that they can convert a tired and increasingly marginalized party into a powerful new movement for social and political change.

Quote worth quoting.

“Though chaotic, the primary system can mobilize large numbers of voters behind a candidate, generating political momentum, media buzz and a valuable database of potential supporters for the next election. And it could transform the Liberals’ image from that of a centrist party that brokers competing interests into a powerful movement for political change.”

get Smart Picks in your Inbox!
Add your opinion Rate this story Share Subscribe E-mail Print

Post new comment

Keep up with CEF!

User login

Login using social networks

Twin Virtues: Inequality of Outcomes & Equality of Opportunity©

LimeSpot: Own Your Experience.

Leveraging Social Networks for Profit.
 
Marrying the product portfolio of brand name firms with the personal profile information on Facebook.
 
The LimeSpot enabled revolutionary new sales channel.
 
Ultimately, the most successful societies find the balance between the twin virtues of inequality of outcomes and equality of opportunity.
 
The new politics must marry the twin virtues of unequal outcomes and equality of opportunity.
 
When too few get too much everybody ends up with less.
 
Can it be that striving for equality of opportunity however imperfect the process not only benefits the individual but also creates benefits for the society as a whole that are unintended but wonderful?
 
Economics must be a 'moral enterprise' as much as politics claims to be. Economic outcomes need to be framed in terms of right and wrong not just efficiency if only because these often align in surprising ways.
 
My vision of Canada is that any Canadian child from a family of limited circumstance can expect to have a chance at lifetime of unlimited opportunities.
 
Tax policy should be founded on the principle of generating steady tax revenues sufficient to maximise environmentally sustainable economic growth in order to fund fair government.
 
Public policy should be designed to decrease inequality before the law and increase equality of opportunity.
 
Capitalism is not the problem; the problem is what we do with capitalism.
 
Content is always more difficult to argue than conspiracy.
 
Let the state regulate and the market operate (most things).
 
Welfare strategies are best designed as a hand up not as a hand out.
 
Political debate should not be fact free fighting.
 
Explanation lasts longer than eloquence.
 
Always favour empowerment over dependency.
 
The most enduring public figures are embraced for the causes they fought for and not the concept of themselves they hoped others would remember them by.
 
Find your voice and don't be the echo of somebody else.